![]() |
The free surface and the CMB are perfect reflectors for SH
waves. These waves bounce back and forth through the mantle for a long time
following an earthquake. The energy is partly reflected at the discontinuities
within the upper mantle and the crust (Figure 3.1 II-IV). The reverberations
can be identified easily in the recordings of an earthquake.
A good overview on ScS reverberations and the used processing methods can be
found in Revenaugh and Jordan (1989), (1991) and
(1991a-c).
Due to the long-period nature of ScS the sharpness of the discontinuities cannot be
resolved. A vast number of different regions have been studied with this method
and evidence for several discontinuities has been found.
The interpretation of the ScS reverberation is not unambiguous, because of a
mathematically exact mirror plane symmetry of the reverberation integral
kernel (Revenaugh and Jordan, 1989). This symmetry of the equations
makes it impossible to decide whether a reflector is located in the upper
mantle or in D'' in the lower mantle. The reflections in the lower mantle for
the 410 and 660 are neglected because the impedance profile in
these depths is constrained to be very smooth by other seismological data
(Dziewonski and Anderson, 1981). For shallower discontinuities other
seismological data must be used to constrain the interpretation as a discontinuity
in the upper mantle.
The ScS reverberation studies give estimates of the reflection coefficients
across the discontinuities and therefore, give good insight into the velocity and
density contrasts.
Recently, a joint inversion of ScS reflectivity profiles, frequency dependent
travel times of body waves (S, sS, SS, sSS, SSS) and surface waves (Rayleigh
R1 and Love G1) were used to produce high resolution seismic models of the
layered structure, the discontinuity depths and the anisotropic structure in
different corridors under the Pacific, Australia and the Philippine sea
presented in Figure 2.3 (Gaherty et al., 1999).