Next: Gutenberg discontinuity
Up: Upper mantle discontinuities
Previous: Upper mantle discontinuities
  Contents
The impedance increase at depths of 60 km - 90 km is called the Hales discontinuity
(the H). The impedance I is defined as the product of density and seismic
velocity: I =
, where
= density and
= P- or S-wave
velocity.
This impedance increase was first detected in long-range seismic
refraction profiles, such as the Early-Rise experiments in continental North
America (Green and Hales, 1968; Hales, 1969). More recently, the H was
detected by ScS reverberation studies in continental regions (Australia) and
island arc regions (Revenaugh and Jordan, 1991b), by array
studies (Simpson et al., 1974), and also by surface wave studies in
oceanic regions (Woods et al., 1991).
The discontinuity is explained by a phase transition from spinel (sp)
garnet (Hales, 1969). This transition has been observed
in laboratory experiments in rocks of pyrolite composition at upper mantle
temperatures and pressures (Green and Ringwood, 1967), and both
minerals (gt and sp) are common in xenoliths originating from different depths
(Nixon, 1987). More recent studies place the phase transition at
depths of 45 km - 55 km (Jenkins and Newton, 1979; Webb and Wood,
1986), but temperature and mantle composition have a strong influence on
the depth of this transition.
The Clapeyron slope
of the spinel
garnet
transition has been determined to be positive for temperatures below
900
C, but the structure of the phase transition is quite complicated
(Wood and Yuen, 1983; Jenkins and Newton, 1979). The Clapeyron slope
is flattening for temperatures higher than 900
C, in good agreement
to seismological detections of this discontinuity and might become negative for very high temperatures.
The P-velocity jump across this discontinuity has been found to be
v
3.2% (Green and Hales, 1968; Hales, 1969), and a reflection
coefficient of 3.5% has been found (Revenaugh and Jordan, 1991b). If
the density change,
, and the shear velocity change,
v
,
associated with the transition follow Birch's law (Birch, 1952;
Anderson et al., 1968) then the reflection coefficient and
v
imply a minimum of
3.2% and
v
3.8%
(Revenaugh and Jordan, 1991b). These values are in good agreement
with laboratory studies for the transition, which find density and velocity
increases of up to 3% (Green and Liebermann, 1976; Webb and Wood,
1986).
Divergent from the phase transition explanation, Hirn et al.(1975) and
other authors (Fuchs, 1983; Forsyth, 1977) quote an increase in
amount of preferred orientation of olivine as the mechanism producing the
velocity jump across the H. The lattice preferred orientation (LPO) of olivine
as source for the discontinuity in these models fail to explain the high S-velocity
contrasts found by Revenaugh and Jordan (1991b) and the correlation
of the discontinuity depth with tectonics. On the other hand the
olivine-orientation model calls for a large variation of the reflection
coefficient with azimuth which cannot be found in the data. Therefore, this
model cannot explain this discontinuity and the spinel
garnet
phase transition is most likely the explanation for the Hales discontinuity.
Next: Gutenberg discontinuity
Up: Upper mantle discontinuities
Previous: Upper mantle discontinuities
  Contents
2000-09-05